EU: Proposed liability rules will harm Free Software

My “one snippet” from today’s IPCC report: “Climate change is a threat to human well-being and planetary health. There is a rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all. The choices and actions implemented in this decade will have impacts now and for thousands of years.”

Combate às alterações climáticas é uma das maiores preocupações dos jovens em Portugal.

@prologic@twtxt.net in the meantime, docker wrote a clarification.

@ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social I usually touch file;git log file|head;rm file.

@ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social well, I mean… can a single-user experiment like that really be called “the metaverse”?

@prologic@twtxt.net Are you sure that’s the case here? The rss feed looks clean…

The way Samsung bundles terms of services and privacy policy updates/acceptance with their Android security updates should be studied.

@@madcap@ciberlandia.pt Vergonha ou não, não estás sozinho!

@slashdot@feeds.twtxt.net #WhatsWrongWithCapitalism

@@madcap@ciberlandia.pt E muito mais havia para fazer, não fosse o número reduzido de funcionários, “manifestamente insuficiente para corresponder ao mandato legal de execução das tarefas necessárias à garantia dos direitos dos cidadãos”… #CNPD

@@post.lurk.org snif!

@eldersnake@twtxt.net Unfortunately it is a plague. In Europe we have CDSM’s Article 15.

This is an image with an alt text with new lines in it. Yarn.social’s web interface renders it “well”, the mobile app does not. Which is the correct behavior? Is this how new lines on image’s alts are supposed to be? If so, should the web interface be replacing the “new line characters” with actual new lines? Or, in fact, what is the correct way to add a new line in alt texta in html?

So many questions 😊 anyone care to comment?

Image

@prologic@twtxt.net I see. Well, as I said, I see value in such a bridge, but I don’t think it replaces yarn.social’s AP integration. It could, however, be used as a backend in yarn.social: a pod would delegate the AP bridging, and all of that would be transparent to the user.

Also, how would you go about it? I mean, I can start using a txt on my client that is actually coming from a proxy service generating it from an AP account (like we already have on feeds), but how do I announce that your service should “follow back” my own feed so you can see replies and translate them into AP replies?

@prologic@twtxt.net While I think this is a cool idea, I don’t think it is a replacement for what you have been trying to achieve on yarn.social.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Wikipedia explains better 😀

Mais uma vez, o Governo Português a favorecer a indústria às custas do ambiente: https://zero.ong/noticias/comporta-gale-zero-denuncia-incapacidade-de-protecao-da-rede-natura-em-portugal/

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Here’s to old school coffee!

Image

@prologic@twtxt.net I see: I was speaking in the end user’s perspective tho, I suppose those concerns only really affect the pod owner? And, if that is the case, giving a pod owner the ability to toggle AP integration on/off us probably good enough to mitigate those concerns?

@prologic@twtxt.net to be fair, I don’t really see a difference here: with the integration, users still only see the feeds they choose to read (either as a twtxt or AP), right? Or this is more a problem of the integration making the network “grow too fast”?

@thecanine@twtxt.net First I allowed myself to be excited, but then I went to read… and they’re not talking about making Facebook talk ActivityPub, but about creating yet another social network 😞

@movq@www.uninformativ.de With 11 years now, she has been still doing covers… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezb8oJqwkH8